Accessibility Reviews for Online Courses

All new and revised online course developments are reviewed using the Quality Matters standards rubric [pdf]. Currently PCC’s Online Learning Accessibility Guidelines (based on WCAG 2.0 AA) are more stringent than the Quality Matters Standard 8. To properly align the two for PCC internal reviews, the order and point values for specific standards 8.1 through 8.5 were adjusted.

What happens if a course doesn’t meet the Standards?

An icon that show a sign post with signs pointing in opposite directionsIf a course doesn’t meet the required 3 point standards, it is given a Provisional Recommendation. A Provisional Recommendation means the instructor has up to one year to address the unmet requirements. During that time the instructor may work with their Mentor, an Instructional Technology Specialist, and the Accessibility Advocate to ensure the course meets the standards when re-evaluated.

If the course doesn’t meet a 2 or 1 point standard, it may still be Recommended. Although, we will note the areas that need improvement so the instructor can work on those as time permits.

PCC Accessibility Review Guidelines

8.1 Course navigation facilitates ease of use. (3 points)
  • Clear and consistent navigation in D2L Brightspace.
  • Avoid using underline for emphasis as this type of formatting can be easily mistaken for a link.
  • Write meaningful link text.
  • When you link to web sites and external web activities, ensure that any action that requires a mouse, such as buttons and drag and drop actions, can also be completed by using only the keyboard.
  • Ensure that websites have keyboard focus (when you tab through a webpage, see if there an indication as to what item you are currently on).
8.2 Course design facilitates readability. (3 points)
  • Accessible technologies/applications must be used for all required material.
  • Use properly formatted headings to structure the documents (HTML, Word, Google Docs, etc).
  • Format lists as lists using the list tool found in toolbar menu (HTML, Word, Google Docs, etc).
  • Create tables with column and/or row headers (HTML, Word, Google Docs, etc).
  • Maintain a proper reading order in web pages, Word documents, and PowerPoint slides.
  • Use sufficient color contrast.
  • Don’t use color alone to convey meaning.
  • Write accessible math and science equations (MathML/D2L Equation Editor for HTML or MathType for Word).
  • Provide alternative text descriptions for images. (This can include posting a detailed description in the text before or after image and reference image or add text that is only visible to screen readers via the “Alt text” functions (HTML, Google Docs, Google Slides, Word, PowerPoint, PDF etc)
8.3 Course provides alternative means of access to course materials in formats that meet the needs of diverse learners. (3 points)
  • Recommend the use of captioned videos. Non-captioned videos will be captioned by Online Learning at time of accommodation.
  • Visual content in videos needs descriptions or alternative assignment that doesn’t require sight.
  • Required course activities that are inaccessible must have an equally effective alternative.
  • PDFs that contain text are not merely an image scan; any text contained in PDFs is selectable and searchable.
  • Optional materials must include a balance of accessible options.
8.4 Course multimedia facilitates ease of use. ( 2 points)
  • Eliminate or limit blinking / flashing content to 3 seconds.
  • Accessible media player(s).
8.5 Information provided about accessibility of all technologies required in the course. (1 point)
  • Provide links to products’ accessibility or assistive technology user information.
  • Include current Accommodations Statement on your syllabus.

Standards from the Quality Matters Higher Education Rubric, 5th Edition. [pdf]
(Retrieved from Lamar University [pdf])